Thursday, April 9, 2009

ACTION ALERT: Stand Strong With President Obama

As I posted earlier today, the Obama administration has announced that it plans to pursue comprehensive immigration reform this year, even in these hard economic times. They are beginning to form a coalition of lawmakers, advocates, and people of faith who will create the political space for this bill to pass.

Nonetheless, anti-immigrant groups around the country are already taking action to rally phone calls, faxes, and emails to President Obama and the Congressional leadership. Just like they have in the past, they hope to shut down the Congressional switchboard with so many calls, as well as shut down all hopes of desperately needed reform.

The difference between the last two Congresses and this one is that there is strong and growing movement of people from all spectrums of our community who are standing for humane immigration reform. And we can make our voices heard.

TAKE ACTION

1. Take one minute to call the Whitehouse and thank President Obama for moving immigration reform in 2009.
- For English, call: 866-584-3962
-For Spanish, call: 866-583-2908

2. Take 2 minutes to fax Senator Reid and Senator Pelosi to tell them to stand strong with President Obama and pass immigration reform in 2009.
-Personalize and send your fax by clicking HERE.

3. Join the FIRM Mobile Action Network by texting "JUSTICE" or "JUSTICIA" to 69866 to get updates and action alerts in English or Spanish to help us win immigration reform in 2009.

Obama, Congress Will Push for Comprehensive Immigration Reform

The Obama adminstration announced yesterday that they plan to push comprehensive immigration reform (CIR) this year, including a path to legal status for undocumented workers. This announcement--to the surprise of some--comes both despite of and because of the current state of the economy.

As FCNL has been saying for years, a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants will benefit ALL workers and finally create a functioning immigration system that will aid the U.S. eocnomy. Legalizing workers enables migrant workers to come forward about labor abuse, exploitation, and undercut wages which hurt the economy as a whole. It also means that migrants can contribute more wholly to our functioning society, by paying increased taxes and social security.

The administration has not released the precise timing, strategy, or principles of their immigration reform bill yet, but they have promised that Obama will speak publicly about the issue in May.

While the New York Times said this morning it was "unclear who would take up the Obama initiative in Congress," Senator Charles Schumer (NY), Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration, Refugees, and Border Security, followed Obama's lead by issuing this statement regarding Congress' willingness to work with President Obama on CIR within the coming year:

"We must solve the immigration issue and we can, even in these difficult economic times. I believe there is a real chance of passing comprehensive reform this year, and the Senate panel on immigration will begin a series of meetings and hearings later this month with an eye towards meeting this goal."

Representative Luis Gutierrez (IL), along with other members of the CHC, have also been on the road gaining political support for CIR on the House side.

FCNL is pleased to hear this announcement from the Whitehouse and Congress and we look forward to and stand ready to help the administration as they move this agenda forward.

A Growing Movement: People of Faith for Comprehensive Immigration Reform

There is a growing movement among communities of faith to stand with immigrants as they seek to come out of the shadows and become full members of our society.

This video made by America's Voice documents the growing participation of people of faith in the call for comprehensive immigration reform. Like the Reedwood Friends Church that saw a raid tear mothers and fathers from their children or the Mountainview Friends Meeting who saw one of their families separated due disproportionate immigration laws, people of faith have realized that immigration is an issue that deeply affects our communities and one which we have the moral obligation to respond to.



"My humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together."

Family unity is a human value. And we should be holding our members of Congress accountable to passing just and humane immigration reform that aligns our countries laws with our fundamental values.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

A Nation of Immigrants: A History (Abridged)

The Immigration Dilemma- Week 2

When discussing immigration, people from many different perspectives agree that United States is "a nation of immigrants." Proponents of immigration tend to highlight that welcoming immigrants is an "American tradition." People who fear or dislike undocumented migration will similarly point out that we are all immigrants and that immigration has shaped the face of the United States, but that the difference is that their ancestors immigrated "the legal way" and were not criminals crossing the border.

But historically, what was the legal way?

This is a lot of information to cover, so the post will be long. Therefore, I've anchored the various sections for you to make it easier to navigate.



UNRESTRICTED MIGRATION: THE ICE AGE TO 1874
Without a doubt, we are all immigrants--even the indigenous peoples of the Americas were once newcomers to their land somewhere between 12,000 and 30,000 years ago. Let us all rest assured, however, that they did not go to their local consulate to receive papers to cross into North American territory. They merely migrated--whether to follow their food source, to escape political oppression, or to partake in adventure. And by the time Christopher Columbus landed in the Caribbean in 1492, there were somewhere between 2 and 10 million native peoples living in the United States.

The first European settlement was then established in Florida in 1565 (once again, not seeking permission or legal documentation from the Native peoples living there), followed by other Spanish settlements along the now Southern border in 1598. The first English colony was established in 1607 in Jamestown, VA, followed by the Puritan colony of Plymouth in 1620. The Dutch settled New Amsterdam (now New York) in 1624 and the French settled in Louisiana in 1699. Other European colonists then began coming by the millions to settle the new colonies.

However, this was not a period of "blissful" migration. As the population of what many people consider their "legal ancestors" grew, the Native population was decimated by warfare, enslavement and European disease. Jamestown was the first settlement to import slave labor in 1619, beginning a long history of forced migration. Tensions existed between settlers from varying European countries; Benjamin Franklin once even said of the Germans:

Why should [immigrants] establish their Language and Manners to the exclusion of ours? Why should Pennsylvania, founded by the English, become a Colony of Aliens who will shortly be so numerous as to [change] us instead of our Anglifying them, and will never adopt our Language or Customs, any more than they can acquire our complexion?

Early immigration to the United States was not "legal" per say, as people arriving in the United States were not filling out papers or undergoing inspection. The European colonies' borders were merely open. But even while Europeans came freely to the land, Native peoples and slaves were moved by force and against their will.

The first major piece of immigration legislation did not come about until the passage of the Immigrant Naturalization Act of 1790, which limited access to citizenship to "free white people" with "good moral character." This law, nor the Alien and Seditions Act of 1798 which permitted dangerous criminals to be deported from the United States, did not affect who was able to enter the country, merely who had citizen-rights in the country. The borders themselves remained open and unrestricted.


EXCLUSION, CONTROL, AND QUOTAS: 1875- 1964
It was not until 1875 that a law passed limiting who could enter the United States. This law forbade "undesirable" people from the U.S., in particular criminals, prostitutes, and Chinese workers. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 then went even further by forbidding all Chinese immigrants and not allowing Chinese people in the U.S. to naturalize as citizens.

In 1891, the Immigration Act centralized the exclusion and control of immigration under one comprehensive immigration act administered by a single government agency: the Bureau of Immigration and Naturalization. Immigration laws for the next thirty years then focused on excluding the entrance of "undesirables" like anarchists and "feeble-minded" individuals.

The Quota Law of 1921 became the first law to place numerical limits on the number of people who could migrate to the United States, capping immigration based on nationality. The particulars of the caps themselves changed multiple times leading up to 1964, responding to varying political and economic trends. It was not until 1929 that the "consular control system" was developed, requiring immigrants to obtain visas before arrival in the United States.

The development of numerical restrictions and a consular control system are both critical to understanding "legal" immigration. On the one hand, it explicitly limited the number of people coming to the United States and placed a class/educational bar on who had access to consular visas; notably, immigrants from Western Europe were not yet subject to numerical caps either. On the other, it did not address the increasing need for labor in the United States, particularly in the agricultural industry.

The agricultural industry's need for labor led to the creation of the Bracero program (1942-1964), which was an early version of temporary migrant visas and guestworker programs created out of an agreement with Mexico. The Bracero program brought Mexican workers to the United States to work with the intention that they would only stay for a limited period without access to permanent status. This program thus by-passed other numerical restrictions, but denied other immigrant rights to these individuals. The program eventually ended due to systemic exploitation.

THE END OF EXCLUSION AND THE LIMITATION OF RIGHTS: 1964- 2000
With the rise of the civil rights movement, the blatantly racist nature of the quota and exclusion system came under increasing critique and, in 1965, Congress passed the Immigration Act of 1965 which comprehensively overhauled the system, abolishing discriminatory quota systems. The Act maintained numerical quotas for varying regions, however, and--for the first time--placed restrictions on migration from Western Europe. The 1965 Act also created the seven-tier family preference system which is still in place today.

While the Immigration Act of 1965 was supposed to be fair, flexible, and comprehensive allowing the US to--in JFK's words--"turn to the world, and to our own past, with clean hands and a clear conscious," the bill did not sufficiently address the future flow labor needs of the time. By 1986, undocumented migration had soared to new levels to fill jobs in the U.S. economy.

The Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) tried to address undocumented immigration in two ways: it legalized those who were already here and imposed higher sanctions for undocumented persons and employers who hired them. It did not, however, raise the numerical limits placed on immigration, meaning that it did not expand the immigration system to meet the needs of the economy.

The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRAIRA) developed even more punitive measures for undocumented immigrants, expanding grounds for inadmissibility, deportation, and bars of entry. That same year, the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconcilliation Act barred even legal permanent residents from participation in social programs for a period of 5-10 years after receiving their green card.

LINKING IMMIGRATION TO NATIONAL SECURITY: 2001-PRESENT
Since September 11, 2001 immigration has increasingly been linked to national security and the Global War on Terror.

Despite attempts to comprehensively reform the immigration system in both 2005 and 2007, the immigration system of today continues functioning under laws formed in 1965, 1986, and 1996 which do not address the current needs of the U.S. economy. Today, there are an estimated 12 million undocumented migrants working in the United States filling jobs that are needed DESPITE the current economic recession. These immigrants had no legal way to come to the United States.

What I hope this rather long post--but quite abridged version of the history of immigration in the United States--teaches us is that for many years there was no "legal way" to migrate. Moreover, if your or my family came to the U.S. before 1986, it is likely they did not come "legally" but instead were legalized--through the entitlement of colonization, the privilege of whiteness, the end of slavery, the rise of civil rights, and an amnesty for workers.

Discussion questions:
  1. What does the history of immigration reveal about the current immigration debate?
  2. Is it encouraging or discouraging to read this abridged history of the US immigration system? Why?
  3. How could a reformed immigration system benefit the US economy?
  4. Who needs to sit at the table when immigration reform is discussed?


Tuesday, April 7, 2009

Neighbor-to-Neighbor In-District Visits

Following our campaign "Prayer, Renewal, and Action on Immigration" which generated over 170 prayer vigils throughout the country, the Interfaith Immigration Coalition has moved into the second phase of its campaign for comprehensive immigration reform.

Beginning yesterday and continuing throughout the Easter/Passover recess, we have asked communities of faith to answer the call to "welcome the stranger" and be a good neighbor by setting up "Neighbor-to-Neighbor In-District Visits" with their members of Congress.

These visits are designed to inform Congress of how communities of faith have welcomed the stranger--in their congregations, through teaching ESL classes, providing sanctuary, sponsoring refugees, etc--and asking their members of Congress to uphold their faith mandate to welcome the stranger by passing humane immigration reform legislation this year.

So far, the coalition has around 120 Neighbor-to-Neighbor visits in the works for the next two weeks. We're also coordinating with the immigrants' rights and labor advocacy communities. Together we hope to have over 300 visits take place across the country.

There is a growing movement for immigration reform. Would you like to take part?

To learn how to set up a Neighbor-to-Neighbor meeting, see the Interfaith Immigration Coalition's "Neighbor to Neighbor Handbook."